<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Avenue180 Blog &#187; YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.avenue180.com/tag/youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.avenue180.com</link>
	<description>Avenue180 Search Marketing Agency Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 16:09:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube’s Advice: Dispute Hitler “Downfall” Parody Takedowns</title>
		<link>http://blog.avenue180.com/emerging-media/youtubes-advice-dispute-hitler-take-downs/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.avenue180.com/emerging-media/youtubes-advice-dispute-hitler-take-downs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constantin Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitler Downfall parody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.avenue180.com/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two days ago, several of the popular Hitler Downfall parody videos were pulled from YouTube because owner  Constantin Films claimed they infringed on the copyright. YouTube  indirectly responded on its blog today by encouraging its users to dispute the  takedowns through a process it already has in place for situations like  this.
YouTube’s only direct reference to the Hitler parodies was a  hyperlink from the word “parody” in the blog post, but it’s clear given  the timing that the Downfall takedowns were the reason YouTube ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two days ago, several of the popular Hitler <em>Downfall</em> parody videos were pulled from YouTube because owner  Constantin Films claimed they infringed on the copyright. YouTube  indirectly responded on its blog today by <a href="http://blog.avenue180.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/hitler3.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-124" title="hitler3" src="http://blog.avenue180.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/hitler3.jpg" alt="" width="260" height="190" /></a>encouraging its users to dispute the  takedowns through a process it already has in place for situations like  this.</p>
<p>YouTube’s only direct reference to the Hitler parodies was a  hyperlink from the word “parody” in the blog post, but it’s clear given  the timing that the <em>Downfall</em> takedowns were the reason YouTube  spoke up. It wrote in general terms about its Content ID system, which  allows copyright holders to request immediate takedowns based on their  own standards.</p>
<p>We’ve got some analysis below, as well as two very  meta Hitler parodies.</p>
<hr />
<h2>Parody-Makers Can Restore Their Videos</h2>
<hr />The  implication of the blog post was that the clips from <em>Downfall</em> were taken down not through the legal process associated with the  applicable Digital Millennium  Copyright Act  (DMCA), but through this Content ID system. As a  result, anyone who uploaded a Hitler video that has been taken down can  dispute the takedown by checking a box that says, “This video uses  copyrighted material in a manner that does not require approval of the  copyright holder.” A dispute immediately restores the video, and the  owner of the copyright may then decide to seek a formal takedown through  the DMCA’s process.</p>
<p>The disputes will likely stick, because it’s  easy to argue that the <em>Downfall</em> videos fall into the parody  category, and parodies are fair use of copyrighted content in the  applicable laws. Some of the videos that were taken down have already  been restored, including the “Hitler Orders DMCA Takedown” video  (embedded below) — that’s the one YouTube linked in its blog post.</p>
<hr />
<h2>Embracing  Free Publicity</h2>
<hr />The Hitler parodies have exposed thousands of  people to <em>Downfall</em> who never would have known about it  otherwise, so Constantin Films’ decision to challenge the videos seems a  little extreme.</p>
<p>Some, however, know that viral videos can be a  form of flattery and free publicity. When asked about parodies users  have made of his company’s own content, Nike VP of Digital Sport Stefan  Olander told the <a href="http://ytbizblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/five-questions-for-stefan-olander-vice.html" target="_blank">YouTube Biz Blog</a>: “Imitation is the sincerest form  of flattery. We love when people engage and participate in the  storytelling.” Even <em>Downfall</em> director <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0386570/" target="_blank">Oliver  Hirschbiegel</a> told <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/01/the_director_of_downfall_on_al.html" target="_blank">New York Magazine</a>, “You couldn’t get a better  compliment as a director.”</p>
<p>Oh, and there’s one more interesting  tidbit: The <em>Downfall</em> takedowns took place on what would have  been Hitler’s 121st birthday.</p>
<hr />
<h2>Hitler Orders DMCA Takedown</h2>
<hr /><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="575" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PzUoWkbNLe8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="wmode" value="opaque" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="575" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PzUoWkbNLe8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" wmode="opaque" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<hr />
<h2>Hitler  Reacts to <em>Downfall</em> Parody Removals</h2>
<hr /><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="575" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kBO5dh9qrIQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="wmode" value="opaque" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="575" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kBO5dh9qrIQ&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" wmode="opaque" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<hr /><em><br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.avenue180.com/emerging-media/youtubes-advice-dispute-hitler-take-downs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans Conducted 15.4 Billion Core Searches in March.  Who&#8217;s in charge of your expanded searches then?</title>
		<link>http://blog.avenue180.com/behavioral-market-research/americans-conducted-15-4-billion-core-searches-in-march-whos-in-charg-of-your-expanded-searches-then/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.avenue180.com/behavioral-market-research/americans-conducted-15-4-billion-core-searches-in-march-whos-in-charg-of-your-expanded-searches-then/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[15.4 billion core searches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore qSearch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craigslist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MapQuest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.avenue180.com/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to comScore  qSearch, Americans conducted 15.4 billion &#8220;core searches&#8221; in March  2010, with Google accounting for 65.1 percent search market share.
What is a core search?  It is search on one of  the five major search engines, including partner searches and  cross-channel searches.  Searches for mapping, local directory, and  user-generated video sites that are not on the core domain of the five  search engines are not included in the core search numbers.
Why is this significant?
If you look at core searches in March, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-101" title="Screen shot 2010-01-12 at 10.30.43 PM" src="http://blog.avenue180.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Screen-shot-2010-01-12-at-10.30.43-PM-300x251.png" alt="Searches on Google for Haiti Info" width="300" height="251" />According to <a href="http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2010/4/comScore_Releases_March_2010_U.S._Search_Engine_Rankings">comScore  qSearch</a>, Americans conducted 15.4 billion &#8220;core searches&#8221; in March  2010, with Google accounting for 65.1 percent search market share.</p>
<p>What is a core search?  It is search on one of  the five major search engines, including partner searches and  cross-channel searches.  Searches for mapping, local directory, and  user-generated video sites that are not on the core domain of the five  search engines are not included in the core search numbers.</p>
<p>Why is this significant?</p>
<p>If you look at core searches in March, then Google accounted for 10.0  billion searches, followed by Yahoo! (2.6 billion), Microsoft (1.8  billion), Ask (593 million) and AOL (380 million).</p>
<p>Get it?  Got it?  Good.</p>
<p>But if you look at &#8220;expanded searches,&#8221; then you get a very different  picture of the search market.</p>
<p>What is an expanded search?  It is a search on the top properties  where search activity is observed.  What are these top properties?  Oh,  YouTube, craigslist, eBay, Facebook.com, MapQuest, MySpace, and Amazon.</p>
<p>If you look at these top properties, Americans conducted 23.9 billion  search queries in March 2010.  That&#8217;s right.  About 8.5 billion  searches were conduct that month on properties that generally aren&#8217;t  considered &#8220;search engines.&#8221;</p>
<p>And 3.7 billion of these expanded searches were conducted on YouTube,  which is less than the 10.5 billion expanded searches conducted on  Google, but more than the 2.7 billion expanded searches conducted on  Yahoo!, or the 1.6 billion expanded searches conducted on Bing.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.avenue180.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/amazon.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-102" title="amazon" src="http://blog.avenue180.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/amazon-300x240.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="240" /></a>And the 664 million expanded searches conducted on craiglist, 659  million conducted on eBay, and 647 million conducted on Facebook.com are  more than the 594 conducted on AOL.</p>
<p>So, definitions matter.  Since YouTube, craigslist, eBay,  Facebook.com, MapQuest, MySpace, and Amazon don&#8217;t crawl you website, who  is in charge of digital asset optimization for these top properties?</p>
<p>Ask your SEO specialist or webmaster that question at your next  marketing meeting.  And if they tell you it&#8217;s not their job, then tell  them that you&#8217;re thinking of taking some of their budget so that you can  create a new position.</p>
<p>Let me know what happens next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.avenue180.com/behavioral-market-research/americans-conducted-15-4-billion-core-searches-in-march-whos-in-charg-of-your-expanded-searches-then/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

